Photo illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
President Trump has gone scorched earth on the architect of his own judicial legacy, disavowing Leonard Leo, the Federalist Society and any judge who stands in the way of the MAGA agenda.
Why it matters: Trump’s alliance with the conservative legal movement powered his takeover of the Republican Party, helping him win over skeptical GOP elites by promising — and delivering — a roster of judges that united the right behind his presidency.
- Three Supreme Court justices and hundreds of judicial appointees later, Trump now claims he was naive — and that the federal bench he shaped is now conspiring against him.
What they’re saying: “I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges,” Trump wrote in a furious Truth Social post Thursday night.
- “I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real ‘sleazebag’ named Leonard Leo,” he continued, claiming that the conservative legal activist “probably hates America.”
- “I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations. This is something that cannot be forgotten!”
Driving the news: Trump’s tirade against Leo was set off by a ruling from the U.S. Court of International Trade — currently on pause — that found he overstepped his authority to impose sweeping global tariffs.
- One of the three judges on the low-profile trade court was appointed by Trump in 2017 and has ties to the Federalist Society.
- “Where do these initial three Judges come from? How is it possible for them to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America? Is it purely a hatred of ‘TRUMP?'” the president wrote.
- It’s the latest example of Trump and his aides claiming a “judicial coup” is threatening democracy by reining in his executive authority.
Flashback: Few figures shaped Trump’s first-term legacy more profoundly than Leo, whose guidance helped stock the federal bench with conservative judges for a generation.
- “We’re going to have great judges, conservative, all picked by the Federalist Society,” Trump promised during his first campaign in March 2016.
- All three of Trump’s Supreme Court justice nominees — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — came from a list personally curated by Leo, according to NPR.
Between the lines: The wildly effective conservative alliance ultimately couldn’t survive MAGA’s bedrock principle: absolute loyalty to Trump, a condition that has doomed countless GOP relationships.
- For Trump, the notion of judicial independence from his personal and political goals is a sign not of a healthy constitutional republic — but of betrayal by allies who owe their power to him.
The other side: “I’m very grateful for President Trump transforming the Federal Courts, and it was a privilege being involved,” Leo told Axios in a statement.
- “There’s more work to be done, for sure, but the Federal Judiciary is better than it’s ever been in modern history, and that will be President Trump’s most important legacy.”
What to watch: Trump’s nomination of his former defense attorney Emil Bove to be a federal appeals judge is a sign of what his judicial picks could look like going forward.
- “We’re not going to be using the Federalist Society to make judicial nominations at all going forward,” White House official Stephen Miller told CNN, condemning “rogue judges” and bad vetting.
The bottom line: Trump is taking no prisoners in his assault on the federal judiciary, accusing any judge who stalls his agenda — even the ones he appointed — of siding with “the radical left.”
- But that doesn’t mean he won’t treat favorable rulings — such as the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling that helped keep him out of prison last summer — as total vindication.